New Mammogram Recommendations

By now you all have seen or heard about the new recommendations on when women should now have their mammograms and how often.  According to the old recommendations, you were recommended to have it done once a year (or every other year) starting at age 40 or at age 35 if Breast Cancer was in your family.  I don’t really know the specifics since it’s not been in our family and I’m not 40 yet.  Anyway, the new recommendations are now age 50 and every other year or every year depending on which article you read.

According to The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/health/17cancer.html?_r=1:

The new recommendations, which do not apply to a small group of women with unusual risk factors for breast cancer, reverse longstanding guidelines and are aimed at reducing harm from overtreatment, the group says. It also says women age 50 to 74 should have mammograms less frequently — every two years, rather than every year. And it said doctors should stop teaching women to examine their breasts on a regular basis.

Now, since this isn’t an issue for me, it doesn’t really effect me, however it does piss me off a bit.  I have read and heard so many people saying that if they had waited, they’d be dead or it would have been too late for them because the cancer would be so far into them that nothing would help them.  How in the world can you not recommend women to have this screening when people in their 30′s and 40′s are being diagnosed and now you are recommending that doctors stop teaching women how to do a self breast exam?  Do they not realize that many women go to the doctor for testing because THEY felt a lump?  Do they not realize or just not care if people are diagnosed early enough to do something about it?

But what really gets me is there are patients out there, who have been diagnosed who are now canceling their surgeries and treatments because of these new recommendations :serious? Are you really that fricken stupid?  Yeah, that’s right, women who have been diagnosed with Breast Cancer are canceling their appointments for surgery and/or treatments!

According to ABC News (http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/health&id=7125827):

In New York, one woman who had already been diagnosed with breast cancer cancelled her surgery after hearing the new report.

“She did because, at 41-years-old, the guidelines don’t recommend a screening mammogram. Therefore she decided that if anything was found on her screening mammogram, it must be insignificant and it didn’t need to be treated. And that’s scary,” Dr. Laurie Kirstein of Beth Israel Medical Center said.

Yeah, that’s really smart! Because some dumb ass tells you that you really didn’t need the screening yet because you aren’t 50, your cancer isn’t significant enough to need the treatment YOUR DOCTOR TOLD YOU THAT YOU NEEDED! :farkingidiot

Let’s just face the true fact.  The insurance companies are tired of paying for women to have these screenings every year, so they are getting U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to change the recommendation to 50 so they don’t have to pay for more women to have this screening.  Yes, another way for the insurance companies to SCREW women.  It’s bad enough we pay more money in premiums for our insurance than men, but now we could be denied the screening that could save our life!

Just remember, this is the same government who is trying to get Healthcare for everyone in the US!

Siggy

About Shawn Ann
I am a born and raised Michigander, wife to a wonderful husband since November 1999, and mother of a hurricane of a boy. In addition to being a wife and mother, I also work full-time as an Accounts Receivables Manager for 3 companies, I sell AVON, and I am a 2010 Baker College graduate with an Associates degree in Business with a concentration in Accounting / Computer Information Systems. You can view my About Me page to learn more.

Comments

  1. Marianne Griffith says:

    Wanted to let you know my mom had routine mammograms and they didn’t pick up anything and she felt a lump and she went in and had to have a biopsy and they said it was cancer and she had breast cancer and had surgery finished chemo. and radiation and has to be on hormone pills for 5 years and her hair has never come back fully because of the pills she has to take so she wears wigs and you know what insurance companies don’t pay for the more aggressive scans (CT) of the breast and my mom did get routine mammograms and look what it did for her, nothing. Didn’t pick up her lump at all. I don’t know if mammograms are worth it in the long run. Scares me to get them and then they not pick up something if I have it. CT’s for a way of doing mammograms is not covered for any insurance. How crazy. I don’t think it is worth it to argue if you should have it at 35 or 40 or even 50. Who cares, for if they don’t work then what’s the big deal. I don’t swear by them and they are not my deciding factor. My mom had the brack test and it said we don’t have breast cancer in our family, but if her mom got breast cancer and her mom’s brother got breast cancer then how is it not run in the family? The whole situation scares the crap out of me. You think about that my mom had them all the time mammograms and she still got breast cancer.

  2. Harriet says:

    It is irresponsible. I went in for a baseline and they found something. Can’t imagine where I’d be had I waited until 50.
    Stopping by via MomDot

Speak Your Mind

*

CommentLuv Enabled